Sunday, March 6, 2011

baking bread, a family tradition


Today’s post is going to be the culmination of two separate efforts to bake bread. First, from February 19th and then from March 5th.

I planned to try my hand at bread baking when I first started the project of learning to bake and blogging about it, but it became more poignant when my family lost our beloved uncle Mike Ruvolo. I’ve mentioned the Ruvolo family once before in my blog, during my first post about my grandmother’s crumb cake, because my cousin Patti Ruvolo put together our family cookbook a number of years ago. The Ruvolos are relatives of mine on my Mom’s side and they are a family of bakers. Uncle Mike owned a bakery for many years and employed many of our family and friends in various capacities; even my Mom used bag up rolls on Sundays when she was a teenager. Needless to say, I got a lot of baking advice from everyone when we gathered for Uncle Mike’s wake.

If there were two things that were very important to Uncle Mike: family and good food. In honor of that, I want to dedicate my bread baking efforts to him. I tried to make bread a few years ago and was really enjoying it until I realized that it was near bedtime and I was only done with the first rising. Sadly, I never got to the actual baking, the dough went to waste and I was so frustrated that I vowed I’d never make bread again because it just took too much time to do. Good thing I’ve matured a little when it comes to things in the kitchen.

Saturday February 19th:

To find my bread recipe, I remembered reading recently in Mark Bittman’s farewell column for The Minimalist in the NY Times that one of his all-time favorite columns he’d done in the series was his no-knead bread. I thought this would be perfect for me: a bit of a shortcut, a little easier to manage, and assured first-time bread-baking success. Not so fast, friend. The recipe seemed easy enough until I got to Step 4 where it called for a 6- to 8-quart oven-safe pot, preferably ceramic. I have one big pot, it’s aluminum and has a non-oven-safe glass top, and I love it. It’s perfect for making soup to last me a week or all the pasta one needs to make a tray of ziti. But it’s not a fancy Le Creuset pot like Mr. Bittman wanted me to have to make the no-knead bread.

Knowing that there had to be other easy bread recipes, I turned to another Bittman resource, his How to Cook Everything Vegetarian book that I’m a huge fan of and make something from just about every week. I found a really simple-looking recipe for bread that has one drawback – it calls for another piece of kitchen equipment I don’t have – a large food processor. I have a small food processor, one that’s the perfect size for my purposes and my kitchen. Thankfully, Mr. Bittman’s book also gives instructions on how to mix the dough for those without food processors, so I was ready to go.

Mr. Bittman’s recipe for Fast Whole-Grain French Bread calls for 2 1/2 cups of all-purpose flour, 1 cup of whole wheat flour, salt and active-dry yeast – all ingredients that I had on hand, which made me very happy.  Now, to do this dough by hand, he recommends putting half of the flour in with all of the salt and the yeast and stirring in about a cup of warm water. His instructions for adding the remaining half of the flour say that as soon as it becomes to difficult to stir with a wooden spoon to turn the dough out onto a flat surface and begin to knead the dough. This sounded easy enough. To start, I put in 1 1/4 cups of regular flour and a 1/2 cup of whole wheat. I added the yeast, the salt and the water and began to stir and watched the dough begin to come together. I added the other 1/2 cup of whole wheat and the dough got pretty difficult to stir. I added a 1/2 cup of the regular flour and had a ball of dough. This was fine, except that I was still missing 3/4 cup of regular flour and my regular-to-whole wheat flour ratio was off, something that Mr. Bittman warns against doing.


I started to knead the dough and was finding that the dough was just really dense and I wasn’t thrilled with its texture. Not wanting to waste my effort, I resolved to just let it rise and make a second batch of dough.

For my second loaf, I decided I’d only use 1/2 cup of whole wheat flour and the process went a little better, but I was still coming up about 1/2 cup short of flour being added in before I had a ball of dough that was no longer able to be stirred by a spoon. I kneaded the dough and set it in its bowl to rise.

I turned the dough out onto my work surface and shaped each ball into a boule shape – a big round loaf – and then let them rest again so they could rise.  As I mentioned, Mr. Bittman’s book is pretty long on technique, so during these hours of waiting for the dough balls to rise, I was reading and rereading his pages on kneading, shaping and rising as I cleaned up the kitchen and picked up the rest of my apartment.  After the dough rose for the second time, I turned it out onto baking sheets. Mr. Bittman recommends using a pizza stone, something that I have, but unfortunately it’s in storage upstate in my parents’ attic, since there’s no place to keep it in my kitchen. One of the dough balls had a harder time coming out of the bowl after its second rising and it fell a little bit. I put my slashes in anyhow and let it bake – big mistake. The bread came out looking kind of withered, but we’ll get to the debacle that was the result of this first attempt at the bread in a minute.


Mr. Bittman’s instructions for the actual baking of the bread call for the oven to be heated to 400° and then dropped to 375° when the bread goes into the oven. Okay, sounds a little weird, but who am I to question? Also, his recipe doesn’t give a baking time, it indicates baking by look (“bake until the crust is golden brown”) or by internal temperature (“at least 210°”). Here’s where I complain about one of my culinary heroes in a semi-rude way. Why is it that there’s a recipe in a vegetarian cookbook that requires you to have a meat thermometer? And, okay, semantics-lovers, even if you call it a “kitchen thermometer,” when else does the average person use it except to test doneness when roasting chicken, turkey, pork or beef? This mostly-non-meat-eater doesn’t have one, and was really starting to regret using this recipe.

I can’t say for sure how long I baked the bread. I started checking it for golden-brown-ness at 15 minutes but the bread never got to golden brown. At close to – I’m guessing – 30 to 40 minutes, I finally decided to pull my barely brown bread from the oven to test how hard the crust was. My best description of the feel of the crust was somewhere between butcher block cutting board and granite countertop. Disaster! Boo on you, Mr. Bittman. As punishment, you must cease writing your new opinion column in the NY Times and go back to writing recipes for the Dining section, starting with a revamp of this recipe redone for someone with a normal NYC-sized kitchen that doesn’t have room for a pizza stone, a big food processor or anything by the lovely folks at Le Creuset.


When the bread was finally cooled, I attempted to cut into it. When my serrated knife jumped out of the crust and nearly sliced open the back of my hand, I reached for the cleaver in my knife collection. Sadly, it was the best tool for the job. And while the crust was an absolute horror, inside wasn’t so terrible; at least it tasted great. There was an air pocket in one loaf, but it wasn’t a great tragedy. I enjoyed the bread, but it hurt my mouth (and my soul, a little) to eat it.


While my cousin, Ginny Degennaro told me at Uncle Mike’s wake that she really enjoyed that I don’t shy away from showing my failures in this blog, I’ve struggled over the posting of my big bread failure because I felt like my post honoring Uncle Mike should be a big success, something he would have been proud of. Enter this week.


Saturday March 5th:

Originally, my project for this week was to be a King Cake, the traditional Mardi Gras treat, to share with the members of my church at this month’s Sunday Potluck. A King Cake is made using a sweet yeasted dough, and the more I looked into making it, the less comfortable I felt in being successful doing it, hence my second go-round with baking bread this weekend.

Instead of beating my head against the wall trying to use the same recipe, I went in search of one that seemed less complicated. In my collection of recipe books, I have two that I consider my old classics: my 1961 version of The New York Times Cookbook and my 2001 version of The Good Housekeeping Cookbook, both of which I stole from my Mom at some point, with her blessing (I think). I typically only pull out the New York Times Cookbook around the holidays because it has recipes for dishes like crown roast of lamb or trout muniere that I stare at wistfully and wish Mom would let us prepare for Christmas dinner. It seems a little dated when it uses words like “Oriental,” but I’ve held onto it because I figure that classic recipes just don’t change. I like The Good Housekeeping Cookbook for the same reason, except that the recipe selection is updated for the 21st century, meaning it includes Mexican and Thai selections and doesn’t consider Italian food to be “ethnic.”

The NY Times recipe for French Bread calls for a tablespoon of shortening, so I gently shut the book with a derisive snort and placed it back onto the shelf to await November. In The Good Housekeeping Cookbook, I found a baguette recipe which looked pretty simple to do. In the first step, the recipe says to “beat” the ingredients, which made a little light bulb go off in my head. Most of the stand mixers that are out there come with paddles for making dough, so I thought to myself that maybe, just maybe, there was something I could get for my hand mixer to do the same thing. When I checked the manual, I learned that I already had everything I needed for this because the weird spiral-looking attachments that came with my mixer were intended for just that purpose. Bonus! I was so ready to try making bread again.

The recipe calls for two cups of warm water, a packet of dry yeast, a tablespoon each of sugar and salt, and about five cups of all-purpose flour. The yeast, water and sugar did their thing for a few minutes and then I was supposed to add the salt and three cups of flour to the mix. The flour mixed in so much easier with the dough paddles on my electric mixer. I added the remaining 1 1/2 cups gradually, mixing as I went along. According to the recipe, the final 1/2 cup of flour is added during the kneading process. In theory.


When I finished adding all the flour that I was supposed to per the recipe instructions, I didn’t have a ball of dough, but it looked pretty much ready to be kneaded. I was so wrong in thinking this. It wasn’t ready to be kneaded at all, but it was ready to stick to both my hand and my flour-dusted work surface.

 
I was so ready to pack it in and just quit for the week, but thought to myself, “No, you can save this.” And just kept adding flour, 1/4 cup at a time, until I actually had a ball of dough that was ready to be kneaded. It was a frustrating and very messy process, and I hated almost every second of it, but I was glad I pushed through. I kneaded the dough for about 7 minutes and then put it into a bowl brushed with some olive oil to keep the bread from sticking, and let it rise for a couple hours. When I came back to the dough, it had grown enormously and was almost to the top of the bowl – I took this as a good sign.


I divided the dough in half and rolled each piece out with my rolling pin (which I got for Christmas and this was my first time using it, yay!) into a rectangle. I then rolled the dough up tightly into baguette shapes and rolled around the ends of each baguette so they’d taper nicely. It was at this point that I realized I couldn’t be nice to the dough and I had to rough it up a little bit to get it to cooperate. This was an extension of the realization that sometimes I’m just a little too tentative when trying out new things in the kitchen and that the ends of the baguettes weren’t going to make themselves taper just because I politely wished they would. So I man-handled the dough a little bit and got three of my four baguette-ends into a nice taper; one of the ends was something of a lost cause.

At this point, we’re going to take a quick commercial break to point out some new stuff I got for my kitchen: new baking sheets! My Aunt Carol and Uncle Ross have been following my exploits and offered to get me something new for the kitchen. They are very pretty and I got to use them this week to bake my baguettes! Thanks, Ross and Carol – very generous of you! Back to our regular programming…


I oiled up my new baking sheet, placed one baguette on each and allowed them an hour to rise. Once they did so, I added my slashes, which again required a little force (I’m sitting at my computer flexing my biceps involuntarily just thinking about how strong I am) and I prepared an egg-white wash. This required the white of one egg and 1/4 teaspoon of salt, beat together and then brushed on top of each baguette. I was a little surprised at this, because I thought that all egg washes utilized the yolk, but I learned something new – thanks, Good Housekeeping! I then placed the baguettes into a 400° oven. Thankfully, the lovely folks at Good Housekeeping gave me a timeframe for baking these: 30-35 minutes with a rotation of trays on the top and bottom racks halfway through.

At the halfway point, I was a little concerned that the bread might have been baking a little too quickly, but I stayed with the recipe’s suggestion for cooking time. When I pulled them out at the 30-minute mark, they were gorgeous and the perfect golden brown color for the crust. I was so happy, I almost started jumping for joy. Instead, I chose to do the next-least-manliest thing I could have and called my Mom to share my excitement.


Once the bread was cool, I put the baguettes in a paper bag that I covered loosely with a plastic bag so they’d stay nice and fresh for the morning. When I was ready to leave for church this morning, I packed a big cutting board with the baguettes and a bread knife in case my pastors didn’t have those things readily available at the start of the potluck. I’ve found that when bringing food to someone else’s party, it’s better to bring supplies to serve my dish. I’d prefer not to stress out the hosts of the party – who are already generous enough to offer up their home and are being attentive to other guests – by asking them to go digging into drawers and cabinets to find something I could have easily carried along with me.

I put the baguettes onto the cutting board and cut a few pieces off to make a nice presentation of it and the bread sliced easily, a good first sign. Inside, the bread looked and felt fantastic. I couldn’t wait to try some, but most of the other dishes hadn’t arrived, so I socialized a bit before grabbing some food. When I finally got a chance to make my own plate about twenty minutes later, almost half of the bread was already gone. Sweet! It seemed like it was a big hit. I cut myself a piece from each baguette and they were both awesome. Outside, the bread had a real rustic, homemade look to it, and to me it tasted like it was from a professional bakery, so I was thrilled and honestly, quite shocked. After the previous debacle with bread baking, and this dough being such a nightmare at first, I was ready for the bread to be kind of a letdown. Luck was with me this week, and I was somehow able to pull it off, I’m not quite sure how. I think I’m going to pass it off as a little bit of luck, a little bit of practice, a little bit of baking bread being a family tradition, and a little bit of Uncle Mike pulling for me to be successful. I got a lot of compliments about the bread from my fellow congregants and was personally really thrilled with how it turned out. I can’t wait to try doing this again, now that I have a bit more of a hang of what I’m doing.

Before I sign out for the week, I wanted to spread around some more thank-yous. First, to all my cousins at Uncle Mike’s wake who have been reading the blog and offered their support and compliments, I really appreciate it – special shout-outs to my cousins Tracy, Patti and Ginny for the baking tips and recipe suggestions. Second, to my Aunt Carol and Uncle Ross for the new baking sheets and storage containers, thanks again. And lastly, for all my fellow congregants at the Greenpoint Reformed Church, thanks for being my taste-testers and not being disappointed that I had regular bread instead of King Cake this week. Next time, I’ll make something sweet, I promise!

Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

a quick mid-week update

Some of you may have noticed that I stopped publishing a taste test follow-up post on my last two projects. It was becoming a little cumbersome to always ensure that I had time to write a thoughtful follow-up during the week – sometimes life can just get a little too hectic. Also, I felt as though my posts felt a little unfinished without including the experience of eating the baked goods along with the experience of baking. Sometimes it will mean I'll be posting just a little later than Sundays, but the last couple weeks I've been late and no one’s complained too loudly.

Also, a long overdue thank you is in order to my Uncle Bob who sent me a new baking cookbook to pull recipes from. It's aptly titled The Big Book of Baking.


Most of the recipes are fairly simple to execute, but even better in that it has lots of really helpful tips for new bakers and a pretty nice glossary, too. I'm really excited to try out some of the recipes that are in it. There's one for red velvet cake – a personal favorite of mine – that looks delicious, as well as a checkerboard sponge cake that, if I can pull it off, will seriously impress all of you. Here's hoping I can make it happen!

And a quick preview of things to come: last weekend I baked bread for the first time and will be posting about the experience soon. Also, last Friday was my Mom's birthday. Since she and my Dad skipped town for the weekend, we'll be celebrating this weekend, so you know I'll be baking her something special to commemorate the occasion. I'm hoping I'll be back onto a normal baking/posting schedule by then, but the Academy Awards could get in the way, we'll see!

Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Monday, February 21, 2011

chocolate chip cookies: redux


Valentine’s Day comes but once a year, and most of us either rejoice in it or loathe it, sometimes regardless of our relationship status. This year I fell more on the side of rejoicing in it, being a happy singleton. Honestly, I almost forgot last Monday was Valentine’s Day, until I realized that many of my coworkers received bouquets of flowers from their significant others. While some people would get upset that they didn’t receive flowers, I was looking forward to spending my Valentine’s with my good buddy and former roommate Devin, a fellow happy singleton. We decided to relive our roommate years with a little tv-on-dvd marathon combined with some baked goods. Since Devin was providing the big flat-screen and his apartment, I offered to bake cookies. I chose cookies so I’d have the opportunity to fix the mistakes from a few weeks ago and also try out my new Silpat sheets.


In response to my question, “Do you have a favorite cookie?” Devin said, “Chocolate Chip Walnut from Levain Bakery.” Oh great, I thought, I’m going to be up against a cookie from a professional bakery, yippee. I told him I’d try my best.

Thanks to the internet, finding recipes is a cinch, even if it’s one that’s a guarded secret. Levain has kept their cookie recipes unpublished, but that hasn’t stopped intrepid bakers around NYC to give it their best shot at duplicating the recipe. One of the recipes that I found was on the blog Parsley, Sage, Desserts and Line Drives by Lisa Michele, who took it upon herself to try to make the Levain Bakery Chocolate Chip Walnut Cookies a few years ago. If you poke around on her site a bit – which I highly recommend – you’ll find she made a second attempt at the recipe almost a year later. I chose to stick with the first one because it seemed a little easier to handle and only called for light brown sugar, which I already had on hand.  I creamed the sugar and then beat the eggs in one at a time. Then I added all of the dry ingredients including 3 1/4 cups of flour – which seemed like a heck of a lot of flour for one little cookie recipe.


Once all the dry ingredients were incorporated, her instructions called for “gently” folding in the chocolate and the nuts, which I have to say I chuckled at. This dough was really stiff and any folding that happened was not going to be gentle. I need to also remark that I had neglected to realize that I didn’t have enough semi-sweet chocolate chips to cover the 2 cups that I needed, so I started to chop up my semi-sweet baker’s chocolate, only to find I didn’t have enough of that also. I added one square of unsweetened baker’s chocolate, just to pump up my numbers, but when all was done, I only wound up putting in 1 1/2 cups of semi-sweet morsels and chunks. It looked like enough, so I just went with it, and folded in the chocolate and the walnuts as gently as possible.

Once that was combined, the mixture went into the refrigerator for an hour, and I feel like this was really key to ultimately making this recipe a big success. With the dough so cold, it was really easy to form it up into the ginormous cookies that look just like the ones at Levain Bakery. This recipe takes the ingredients you’d use to make a normal batch of 24 cookies and yields approximately 12. Not only would the cookies warm our hearts for Valentine’s Day, apparently they’d stop them as well.

I preheated the oven, and pulled the dough out of the fridge. I set up my cookie sheets with my brand new Silpat sheets and got ready to form up the cookies. Since only four would fit on each of my cookie sheets, I had to do these cookies in a few different batches. Also, since Lisa’s recipe isn’t very specific on baking time (16-23 minutes is a long window for cookies!) I started with just four cookies and went for 16 minutes. They were way underdone at 16, so I put them in for a few additional minutes. They came out looking perfect.

Confident that the time of about 18-19 minutes wouldn’t burn the cookies, I threw the next batch in with two trays and started cleaning up. Again, they came out looking perfect. I was really happy with the way they turned out. And thanks to the Silpat sheets, no burned bottoms! Hurray! Thanks for the tip, Anna!


The following night, I met Devin after work. We took the train out to his place in Queens and ordered some food from a local Peruvian restaurant that never sent our order. After we slowly starved for a bit, we decided we had to crack open the cookies and have some as we watched a couple episodes of Will & Grace Season 8.

These cookies are so good. So good! I could not believe that they came out of my kitchen! They were moist on the inside, but not raw. The chocolate was still gooey and melted on our fingers a little bit. And the cookies were just baked to perfection. I normally am not a fan of nuts in cookies, but I loved the big chunks of walnut in these. They really jazz up the whole cookie experience and give each of the cookies a little bit of body. Without the walnuts, these would just be rather boring, so I appreciate them not just for making the cookies better, but helping me to expand my own palate.

And for the moment of truth, asking Devin how my cookies compared to Levain Bakery’s cookies: “Not the same.” My heart sank for the microsecond it took him to qualify his response. “Your cookies had an airiness to them. Levain cookies are very thick, so I appreciate the airiness. Your cookies were lighter.”


Success! Many thanks to Lisa – I couldn’t have done this one without her help. I hope that I’ll be able to develop the skills necessary to duplicate someone else’s recipe myself someday. This recipe is definitely a keeper and one I can’t wait to make again.

Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

the superbowl of brownies


Last Sunday, two opposing teams were locked in an all-out battle for supremacy, forces of darkness and light engaged in an eternal struggle, but only one could be declared the ultimate winner. I speak not of the Superbowl, played last week in Texas between the Green Bay Packers and the Pittsburgh Steelers, but rather the battle in my kitchen between two sets of untraditional brownie recipes.


It all started a few weeks earlier, when my group of Glee friends decided we’d all watch the Superbowl together so we could catch the new Glee episode together. We decided to potluck and, naturally, I decided I would bake something. The person who brought me into this awesome group of friends, my friend Leah, has been successfully navigating the Jenny Craig weight-loss program and specifically asked me if I would bake something Jenny-friendly so that she would have the opportunity to try my baking experiment. I told her to send me on one of her recipes and I’d see if I could swing it. She forwarded on a few options, but I immediately latched onto a recipe for peanut butter chocolate bars. I’m having a very difficult time picking out two flavors that are more perfectly suited for one another and more heavenly when combined – peanut butter cups are my favorite candy, and I’ve never come across ice cream better than Stewart’s Chocolate Peanut Butter Cup ice cream (if you’ve never tried it, stop reading this blog, go get some and come back – my writing will still be here, and probably seem better with the ice cream in your stomach). It’s worth noting that peanut butter was first developed by the Aztecs, and that their civilization utilized cacao beans for currency. I’m not saying that it’s why aliens visited the Aztecs and helped them build pyramids, but I bet it was a contributing factor. Regardless, I had high hopes for our peanut butter chocolate bars.

But just in case they didn’t work out, I wanted to have a backup in place for the other folks who’d be at the party, especially in case the Jenny Craig recipe came out as tasting too “healthy.” There’s nothing to kill the buzz of an overindulgent Superbowl party like a dessert that tastes like your gym would approve of you eating it. However, I’d been really bummed out at how much butter I’d been going through in the last six weeks as I’d been baking. It seems like every recipe calls for two sticks of butter, and I’ve honestly never gone through so much butter so quickly in my life. I was thinking to myself, “Is there a way I can do regular-style brownies, but stay away from using so much butter?” Enter a fantastic article in the New York Times the week before the big game with a few brownie recipes that all used only olive oil for their fats. Ask and ye shall receive.


So, our two competing recipes were Jenny Craig’s peanut butter chocolate bars and The New York Times’ Olive Oil and Coconut Brownies.

Peanut Butter Chocolate Bars (PBCBs)

1 stick butter
1 cup Equal
1/3 cup brown sugar
1/2 cup 2% milk
1/2 cup creamy peanut butter
1 egg
1 tsp vanilla extract
1 cup flour
3/4 cup quick oats, uncooked
1/2 tsp baking soda
1/4 tsp salt
3/4 cup semi-sweet chocolate chips

A couple of things here on the PBCBs. First off – really, Jenny Craig, a whole stick of butter? Come on, these are supposed to be healthy! Can’t we substitute out some of the butter so I can use real sugar instead of Equal? Equal is quite possibly the grossest taste in the world to me – bitter and metallic. Luckily, the only Equal I could find at the grocery store was in packet form, so I went with Splenda, which is less offensive on the palate. Also, health nuts, I only ever stock skim milk, so that’s what went into this recipe.

Olive Oil and Coconut Brownies (OOCBs)

3/4 cup olive oil
1/3 cup cocoa powder
2 oz unsweetened chocolate
2 large eggs
2 large egg yolks
1 tsp vanilla extract
1 3/4 cup four
3/4 tsp salt
2 1/2 oz semi-sweet chocolate
2 cups shredded sweetened coconut
fleur de sel
 
On the OOCBs, two quick notes. First, separating eggs! Scary! Second, I skipped the fleur de sel. It’s fancy, expensive sea salt, and way too trendy and precious to put on some brownies to be consumed in a post-pizza, -wing, and -Dorito bingefest. Maybe if I were making this recipe to impress someone with my knowledge of the latest in chocolate trends I would include it, but this party was more “Dude, this guy can bake, awesome” and less “Dude, Mark Bittman stopped writing The Minimalist, bummer.” When baking, it’s vital to know your audience!

I started preparing the PBCBs first. The instructions were fairly straightforward: cream the butter, add the wet ingredients, add the dry ingredients a little at a time, stir in chocolate chips, bake at 350 for 20 mins. Simple stuff, and it all came together pretty seamlessly. I decided to mix all the dry ingredients together in a bowl so I could add them all together a little at a time, it just seemed the right way to do it and it worked fine. I left the batter in its bowl and set it aside while I made the other brownies.

The OOCBs started off with combining the cocoa powder with some boiling water, and adding the chopped-up unsweetened chocolate to the mixture to melt it. This was not as simple as it seemed. Despite being totally separated into smaller pieces, the chopped-up chocolate kept glomming back together in a big clump, which took a while to melt down. To this, I whisked in the olive oil, and then the eggs, yolks, vanilla and sugar. All went pretty smoothtly. I was super-nervous about separating the eggs just because it’s not something I do often and if you break the yolk while separating the eggs, you render the egg pretty much useless. My first yolk did break, but it was as I was plopping it into the bowl once it had been separated already from it’s white, so that was pretty great. Now I feel less rusty on the skill and look forward to using it again soon. Then the OOCBs recipe threw me another curveball: folding. I had to “fold in” the flour, salt and chopped-up semi-sweet chocolate. Ugh! It was like I was back in the pocket while my offensive line kept the the egg-separating linebacker at bay, but suddenly I look up and there’s 300 pounds of folding barreling down on me. Bet you weren’t expecting a well-executed baking-as-football simile were you. That’s just how we do on a boy bakes in brooklyn.

Successfully separated eggs. Booyah.

In baking, folding has to be done gently as to not overly disturb the mixture you are trying to put together, scooping one ingredient from the bottom of the bowl and gently laying overtop the other one. I remember being a kid and sitting at the kitchen table at our friends the McGraw’s house and watching transfixed as the meringue of a lemon meringue pie was prepared. As I sat, completely entrance by the white mixture in the bowl, it was as though I was staring into a crystal ball and watching myself completely screw up this skill sometime in the future. The way it was done so delicately, I thought to myself, “This is just something I will never be able to do properly.” Well, I had to do it last Sunday, and it wasn’t so bad. I still feel like I overworked the mixture a bit, but the flour just kept appearing in big white bursts and never quite seemed incorporated into the chocolate mixture. Definitely something I need to keep practicing before I feel comfortable.

Now that the OOCBs were prepared, I greased up their pan, poured in half the mixture, added half the coconut, poured in the other half and topped it with the remainder of the coconut. This would have to bake a little longer at 350, so I threw it in first. I then greased up the pan for the PBCBs and poured in the batter. I quickly glanced back at the Jenny Craig recipe to see that this measly amount of batter would be used to make forty-eight brownies. That is just evil. Basically, you can have one of the PBCBs and stay on the diet plan, but only if you have a 1” x 1” square of dessert. Shame on you, Jenny Craig. I threw the PBCBs into the oven and prayed everything would go okay.


Oh, how wrong I was. The PBCBs were supposed to bake for 20 mins. At 15, the smell of burning filled up my tiny apartment. I rushed to the oven and saw that the whole bottom of the PBCBs was a very dark black. I quickly pulled the pan out of the oven, and to prevent any further cooking in the hot pan, dumped the entire tray out onto my cutting board in hopes of salvaging at least a few pieces for Leah to have for dessert. I’d promised her I’d make them so she could be included in dessert and now I was crushed. It was a nightmare.

 
I did my best to salvage the PBCBs but they were pretty hopeless. Luckily there were a few true squares that weren’t totally black on the bottom, maybe five or six, so Leah had a true dessert to have with the rest of us. I also was able to rescue most of the top half of the PBCBs, so we had some delicious PBCB crumbles to nosh on for the latter part of the game. And honestly, these tasted pretty great. There was just the slightest taste that they weren’t a real dessert, but I think overall if you tried them without knowing they were a diet recipe, you’d just think that the person who made them just wasn’t a great baker. I completely fault the Jenny Craig recipe folks for the fact that nearly the whole tray burned. There’s no way that the PBCBs should have been cooking at 350 for that long if at 3/4 of the way to the minimum cooking time, the PBCBs look like charcoal. Again, shame on you, Jenny Craig. You’ve done some wonderful things for a number of people, Leah included, but you totally screwed me over with this recipe. And you left me with a half-box of Splenda.


On to the debacle with the OOCBs, which were supposed to come out after 25-30 mins at 350. Now I’m gonna quote directly from the article, because they also did not know how long to cook their brownies for. “… Bake until just set and firm to the touch, about 25 to 30 minutes. (These brownies solidify as they cool, so inserting a toothpick to check for doneness will not work; it does not come out clean.)” Lies. All lies.

I checked these brownies at 25 minutes and they were firm to the touch, so I pulled them out and let them cool completely while I got ready to go. The last thing I was going to do before heading out the door was to cut up the brownies. The pan was completely cooled and I cut into brownies that were completely raw on the inside. By now, my oven had cooled off and kickoff was 20 minutes away. With a moan of severe frustration, I turned the oven back to 350, threw the brownies directly in without bothering to preheat and cooked them for another 20 minutes. What a nightmare. At this point, I couldn’t wait another 45 minutes to let them cool completely again, so I had to make sure they were completely done when I pulled them out of the oven. I spot-checked with a sharp knife and the blade came out clean.

These brownies were a pain in the neck, but totally delicious. They were decadent but not too rich, and the coconut wasn’t overwhelming. I’m not a big fan of shredded coconut, but this worked nicely for me. I felt that the second baking of the brownies made the texture a little tough, but what are you to do when the recipe fails you? Unfortunately, the claim made in the article was that the olive oil would make the brownies super-moist – not so much when they don’t behave according to plan. I’d be willing to try this recipe again, but not for a while. It was a lot of work.


So in the end, I missed seeing poor Christina Aguilera flubbing some lines in the National Anthem, but the party was a big success and I got to share my baking with some new friends. Leah loved her PBCBs, and the OOCBs were a big hit as well. At the end of the night, both the Packers and The New York Times emerged victorious, but only by a slim margin. And did you see Glee afterwards? I enjoyed it, but the Warblers scene was a little too fleur de sel for my tastes: trendy, precious and completely superfluous.

Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Monday, February 7, 2011

new york-style cheesecake: the taste test


This week was an enormous success. It helped to restore some of the faith in my abilities that I lost with the cookie-burning fiasco the previous week. The cheesecake looked good, but most importantly, it tasted fantastic.

Someone pointed out to me that I forgot to mention that I used chocolate wafer cookies for my crust, so it looked like I just burned regular Nilla Wafers when making my crust. Sorry to anyone who got confused! I used a package of chocolate wafer cookies that were actually very overpriced for a 9 oz. package of cookies. When I saw that they cost almost five bucks for the sleeve, I almost threw in the towel on the chocolate crust and went for a package of graham crackers instead. I would have had to find a different recipe, which was somewhat difficult since I was at the store and had all the other ingredients ready to go. Thankfully, Mom and Dad were bankrolling this week’s operation (thanks guys!) and my Mom said to just go ahead and get them.

It was worth it – the crust turned out so perfect. It held up and didn’t crumble when we cut up the cheesecake. And when we took a bite of the cake with the crust, it had held up so well that it wasn’t soggy at all. It still had some crunch to it without being overly crispy. It was just the way that I like the crust on my cheesecake. I was so thrilled with the way it turned out.


Now the filling of the cheesecake was a little different. It tasted fantastic, it was creamy and silky smooth. However, because I defied some of Martha’s instructions, a tiny bit of the center had not quite set all the way. Honestly, I think that had I just refrigerated it for the full six hours instead of just four, it would have been perfect. But that also means that some of Martha’s instructions are a tad too much, since the cheesecake didn’t go into the refrigerator once it had completely cooled. The spring-form pan was still warm to the touch when I put it in the fridge, but with dinner needing to be cooked, I didn’t have any more time to wait for the cake. Next time, though, the cheesecake will be an all-day affair, not just an all-afternoon and evening affair.

Our family friend June joined us for dinner and dessert the night that we had cheesecake. In addition to helping take the spring-form pan off the cheesecake when it became a two-person operation because the bottom lip of the pan was a little bent. June called my whole meal “real adult food” in contrast to the fare she typically has at home with her 11 year old grandson. I had roasted a whole chicken on top of some potatoes and chorizo, and also made a garlic soup, and kale with pine nuts and raisins. We’d had a great feast and the cheesecake was the perfect ending to the whole meal.


Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Sunday, January 30, 2011

new york-style cheesecake


This week is a special edition of a boy bakes in brooklyn: on the road. After the rather disappointing experience with chocolate chip cookies, I travelled upstate to my parents’ house in Millbrook for a weekend away from the city. Knowing that I’d be there for a baking day, I decided to make something that required some of the baking tools in my parents’ kitchen that I don’t have access to in my own – for example, a spring-form pan and a big food processor.

Cheesecake is a dessert that I remember we made quite a bit when I was younger, especially since it’s my brother’s favorite dessert. It always seemed so complicated, necessitating techniques that you only come up against while doing complicated baking, like separating egg whites from egg yolks, baking in a water bath, and lots of precision. Also, cheesecake required me to make a crust, something I really want to practice as I learn how to bake, so that I can eventually make my own pie crusts.


I chose the cheesecake recipe for this week from Martha Stewart’s Baking Handbook. In preparation for starting this blog, this was a book that I consulted to brush up on a few baking techniques, review basic baking tools, and pick a few aspirational recipes, this cheesecake being one of them. Since I had to return the book to the library a few weeks ago, I pulled the recipe from her website (http://www.marthastewart.com/recipe/new-york-style-cheesecake) where I found there was also a video of her putting together the cheesecake on her TV show, so I was excited to have an additional resource to look to for guidance while tackling this difficult baking project. Luckily, this particular cheesecake didn’t require egg separating, so I dodged that bullet. But it did suggest baking with a water bath, so I was eager to meet that challenge.

The crust was really easy to do, though it required the use of my Mom’s big food processor, something I don’t have in Brooklyn. I have a smaller one, but breaking up the wafer cookies in mine would have taken a few different batches. After the cookies were sufficiently pulverized, I mixed them with a couple tablespoons of sugar and some melted butter. Then I pressed the crumbs down into the bottom of the greased spring-form pan and a little bit onto the sides. Getting the crumbs pressed onto the sides was a little difficult, but with some elbow grease, it eventually worked out. I baked the crust for about ten minutes and set it aside to cool.


While it was cooling, I started in on the cake. The recipe called for three pounds of cream cheese to be beaten together until it was light and fluffy, then have flour and sugar slowly beaten in later. Unfortunately, I read the recipe incorrectly and started beating the cream cheese at first with all the sugar in the bowl, thinking it was like creaming butter. Oops. It really didn’t cause too much of an issue, but it was pretty difficult to get the cream cheese light and fluffy at first. It got there eventually – thank God for electric mixers.


I added the flour a little at a time, and then beat in the vanilla extract and sour cream. Once those were fully incorporated, I added in the eggs one at a time. Instead of worrying about breaking each egg separately into the cake mixture – all the while stressing over possible shell shards making their way into and trying to fish them out of the perfectly white batter – I put all of the eggs into a darker-colored bowl. This way, if any shell shards got away from me I’d see them as I was cracking open the eggs. Also, the bowl made it easy to pour the eggs into the cake mixture one by one.


After the eggs were all mixed into the batter, I poured the mixture into the now-cooled crust and covered the bottom and sides of the spring-form pan with a double-layer of aluminum foil. Then I placed the cake into a big roasting pan so that we could surround the cake with some boiling water. One of the hallmarks of a successful cheesecake is whether the top of your cake is free of cracks. Martha’s suggestion for preventing cracks from forming is to bake the cake in a hot water bath. Once the hot water was poured into the roasting pan, it took all three of us to get the flimsy pan into the oven. We managed with only minimal water spillage.

 
Once the cake went into the oven, it had to bake for forty-five minutes at 350, another thirty minutes at 325, and then sit in the warm oven with the door cracked for an hour. I pulled the cake out of this last step at around the fifty-minute mark so that we could use the oven to start preparing dinner. The recipe instructions told me to let the cake cool completely on a wire rack and then refrigerate the cake for six to twenty-four hours. Despite getting up and shopping early, by the time I refrigerated the cheesecake for six hours, we’d be having dessert at almost midnight. We made and ate dinner and I pulled the cake out after only four hours. Wherever Martha Stewart’s secret lair is, I’m sure that an alarm was going off, telling her that someone was deliberately disobeying her recipe instructions. But the cake looked perfect – see for yourself.


What happened when we cut into the cheesecake? Tune in tomorrow for the results of the taste test.

Thanks for reading!

- Jon

Saturday, January 29, 2011

a tale of two cookies: the taste test


This week I experienced my first taste of failure. I was not thrilled with the way that either of these two cookies turned out because quite a few of the bottoms got burnt. The cookies made from scratch were so much better than the cookies made from store-bought dough, but I don’t think that came as a huge surprise.

Let’s start with the store-bought dough cookies, so we can talk about them now and never speak of them again. The few cookies from this group that didn’t burn were crispy and virtually taste-free. The chocolate chunks were evenly distributed and a decent size, but they didn’t taste much like chocolate. I really like my chocolate chip cookies to have a nice soft center to them, but these had almost the texture of crackers. Terrible, chocolate-studded crackers.

My homemade cookies tasted great for the most part. I was disappointed by how many I discovered to have burned, but overall, they really weren’t that bad. Cookies are definitely something I am going to work on again in a few weeks, I really want to improve on them. I got a suggestion from my friend Anna to use Silpat baking sheets when doing cookies, and when I brought this idea up to others, I found that many baking friends and acquaintances swear by them. I will definitely pick some up before I do cookies again. The homemade cookies did have that delicious soft center to them that I crave in a good chocolate chip cookie, the chocolate morsels were evenly distributed and melted to perfection in the few cookies that I sampled for myself. The cookies were flavorful, but I feel like they can be better. I also would like my homemade cookies to look a little bit more like the other ones did on top – they were just so professional looking. Maybe it’s something that comes with practice. I’ll have to see.

I shared the cookies with my coworkers, who seemed very happy for the treat on the last day of our fiscal year. The homemade cookies went really fast, while there is still a full Tupperware container of the other cookies sitting on my desk waiting to be thrown out come Monday. I was nervous about the snow that was supposed to hit over the weekend possibly closing the building and the cleaning crew not being able to empty out my trash over the weekend. One of the last things I want to find at my desk on a Monday morning is the lingering odor of burnt cookies – gross! The reactions to the cookies were pretty positive. Most people responded that the cookies were great, and I truly appreciate it. I’ve said it before, but I’m my own worst critic sometimes, so I’m definitely harder on myself than the other taste-testers I have. I was also surprised to find out that lots of people really like burnt baked goods, because some of my coworkers responded to my burnt-offering apology with the kind, “Doesn’t matter to me,” and even “No, I like the burnt ones!” This leads me to believe that people will take any free baked goods they get, or maybe that the folks in my office are so starved for homemade baked goods that the quality of the product doesn’t even matter. For the next couple taste-test columns, I’ll be employing other testers, so we’ll have to see.

With this project I came up against my first brush with a bad finished product, but I’m eager to push through. I will definitely be investing in some Silpat sheets and will be trying cookies again in the near future. Stay tuned!

Thanks for reading.

- Jon